OMNIBUS-
![]() |
This bill, TTTB/Dedito Omnis Ignovi Omnibus, has passed the Wiki's Congress Committee and will be laid down as a law! |
TS-
![]() |
This bill, TTTB/Dedito Omnis Ignovi Omnibus, has passed the Wiki's Congress Committee and will be laid down as a law! |
Well, I can definately declare the Ben Hun war a Crisis. Once again, I fell to my guilt and let him go. I know Ben Hun won't learn, but religiously, I did exactly what I was supposed to do. Jesus said to forgive, and boy, did I forgive! It takes a lot of guts to let someone go. I've tried to be kick-butt in the past, and I'm extremely good at it when I do it, but what does it REALLY accomplish? I did what God commanded me to do: to forgive, as He so forgave.
Now, you could debate this to the end of time, but I feel that I did the right thing. I haven't lost any sleep over my mercy on Ben Hun. However, the matter is not resolved. A manipulative villain is wondering free. I no longer have a problem with this, but the Masses are outraged. I took him to the gallows, but I didn't hang him because he showed humility, as one put it. Then, ZK consumed too much alcohol, and it degraded to choas.
This bill is Latin: Surrender All Pardon, Omnibus.
In law, an Omnibus is many laws rolled into one. "Surrender All Pardon" relates to me.
Now, let's get some legislation!
--† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Are YOU a rebel? † 01:22, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
The bill
THE COC AMENDUM: A SERIES OF AMENDMENTS CONCERNING THE RECENT CRISIS, BEN HUN, AND TS' RIGHT OF PARDON
CONVENED APRIL 25TH 2010
OVERVIEW
IT IS DEEMED NECESSARY AND PROPER to introduce a large series of legislation, like a BOSS, to prevent such chaos, like that experienced in the days prior to this Bill, so to prevent any absolute chaos from occurring like this in the future.
FORMALITIES
- THE CHAOS that occurred in these days prior to the submittal of this Bill like a BOSS are to officially be recognized as the third Crisis to occur on the Club Penguin Fanon Wiki.
- BEN HUN is to be labeled the primary factor in the creation of this Crisis. TurtleShroom is to be additionally cited as a major contributing factor, as is the overall insanity of the situation and the failure to block him early and pre-emptively. TurtleShroom's mercy and overuse of pardons are to also be cited as the cause of this Crisis, as he should have let Ben Hun go.
- BEN HUN is to be punished as deemed just by the overall consensus of the Community (everyone, both user and BOSS), and, excluding verbal vows and pacts made in the days prior, is to never receive his Seized articles' OOC rights back, excluding Lulz-Cat, which shall remain in his possession indefinitely due to sleazy deals made in said days prior with other users.
COC AMENDMENTS: POWER GIVEN TO THE BOSS
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the BOSS to shut blog commentary off for any reason they so deem necessary to the stability or security of the site, or because the Masses so requested it, or because it is spam, or because it has degraded to flaming.
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the BOSS to issue harsher blocks to those who harrass and annoy other users that are not TurtleShroom.
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow for the seizure of intellectual property (and release thereof into Fair Game or give it to those who wish to edit and use it onward) or other collateral deemed appropriate if a guilty user goes crazy enough to so demand it, but ONLY if this is agreed upon by the Masses in a Public Vote.
COC AMENDMENTS: POWER GIVEN TO EVERYONE/THE MASSES
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the Masses to call for sudden and immediant halting of commentary in any blog they see as a nuisance. If four or more users so demand and vote for a commentary shutdown and provide a good reason, a shutdown is to be administed as soon as possible by the nearest available BOSSMASTER.
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the Masses to call for seizure of intellectual property from any user for any reason they so desire, and to proceed to give it to whomever wants it (or release it), if five or more users all demand such and provide a valid, just reason.
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the Masses to call for Deletion of any blog they so deem needed to be deleted. If four or more users so consent, the blog is to be deleted by the nearest available BOSSMASTER.
- THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the Masses to call for an injunction of a villainous user to stop doing something they deem evil, villainous, counterproductive, or annoying. If four users so consent, the BOSS are to administer the Injunction on their behalf post-haste through a convenient talk page message. Failure to obey an injunction results in a week's block per violation. After seven times, the block is changed to be infinite. Injunctions are to function like restraining orders.
COC AMENDMENTS: DEFINITIONS
- HENCEFORTH, "SPAMMING REPEATEDLY IN BIG, BOLD TEXT" is to be deemed Vandalism, not spam, and is to be treated and punished as such.
- HENCEFORTH, a "pardon" is to be defined as a total revocation of a standing block, allowing the formerly blocked villain to run free. Reduction of sentence is to not be considered as such, rather, as simply a commutation, unless the sentence is a ridiculously short time, like 10 minutes..
- HENCEFORTH, all blog commentary posted by a user while under the influence of excess alcohol is to be deleted on the spot, if said over-consumption of the poison can be proven.
POLICY AMENDUM: POWERS STRIPPED, TURTLESHROOM
- AS A LEADING CAUSE IN THE CRISIS, the user addressed in TurtleShroom is to Surrender his ability to pardon users until June 27th, 2010. His blocking authority and rights are to continue as is. The authority to pardon will be restored after the established date here.
- THIS BILL HEREBY ALLOWS THE MASSES to call for an Injunction on TurtleShroom, at any time after June 27th 2010, from ever pardoning a user or commutating his sentence. If three or more users so demand, TurtleShroom can not pardon or reduce the sentence of a blocked villain. A convientent template may be installed to remind him of such. He may, however, increase the sentence, but if increased, it can not be decreased by TurtleShroom.
- THESE AMENDMENTS DO NOT EFFECT any other BOSSMASTER or their powers.
- THESE TURTLESHROOM AMENDMENTS MAY BE APPROVED SEPERATELY FROM THE REST OF THE OMNIBUS BILL.
WRITTEN THIS SUNDAY OF APRIL TWENTY-FIFTH, IN AMINO DOMINION TWO THOUSAND TEN.
-SO BE IT,
--† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Are YOU a rebel? † 01:22, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
Vote
ALL USERS, EXCLUDING BEN HUN AND AGENTGENIUS, MAY VOTE ON THIS BILL.
VOTE: The Omnibus
Stand up and be counted!
FOR: The Omnibus
Please give a good reason why.
- Good laws, gives the masses and the BOSS needed abilities, and Ben's had enough pardoning. Yours Truly, Explorer 767
(Meta Knight is everywhere.) View this template 01:37, April 26, 2010 (UT)
- If this stops what happened last night, I'm all in for it. --Austin8310-FALCON-DOUBLE FAULT! 02:31, April 26, 2010 (UTC) 02:28, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I was watching what happened, it was bad. Ben needs to be banned. Also, TS, sorry if I sound rude, but as HF said, you are soft, letting everyone go. --Anniemoose98, Talk to a BOSS here
11:50, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. The madness needs to end. I am upset seeing what happened during this whole conflict. TS, your right. Jesus would've wanted the same thing from me. I also don't blame you for doing want God wants. --Screwball86 There's a croutan in my salad! 20:23, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree these laws aregreat. This Ben Hun war has been on since the week if Feb. 21, when I was in Ft. Lauderdale on vacation... Sanchonachos:The Captain You are Now Free to move about the Wiki 00:36, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- BYE BYE BEN HUN!!!--12yz12ab Talk to me Edits Contribs 21:42, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- I just want that spam-master out. --Speeddasher
AGAINST: The Omnibus
Please give a reason why.
- Ben Should keep his articles. Plus 4 users shouldn't be able to turn over a blog. Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! [[Special:Contributions/Mectrixctic|see my Special:Editcount/Mectrixctic edits!]] 14:15, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Same reason as Mectrixctic. ----I am Corai.Hes my best friend best of all best friends Do you have a best friend too? 01:28, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- First I thought "Hey yeah! This is great, all the policies are good and stuff." But then I realised it is a cleverly disguised method of banning Ben Hun. --ZE SHEEP! (Talk page OF DOOM) 20:36, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
COMMENTS: The Omnibus
Should anything be added, rephrased, deleted, etc.?
- Please give a tl;dr version for both versions: don't want to read that XBOX HUEG bill. Also, didn't ZK tell you about crisises? --Zapwire (talk/blog/edits) 10:06, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Mmmmyeah, I was gonna post my "no such thing as a crisis" speech but nobody listened so didn't bother with it. Also, I lol'd when I saw that alcohol amendment. And by that, I mean IRL lol'd. http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1254/lockkey.png ZoneKill T C E 12:12, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I knew you'd enjoy the alcohol thing, ZK. Still, it needs to be done! :) _ --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 21:36, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I knew you'd enjoy the alcohol thing, ZK. Still, it needs to be done! :) _ --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 21:36, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Mmmmyeah, I was gonna post my "no such thing as a crisis" speech but nobody listened so didn't bother with it. Also, I lol'd when I saw that alcohol amendment. And by that, I mean IRL lol'd. http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1254/lockkey.png ZoneKill T C E 12:12, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- People shouldn't be aloud tp vote people into blocks, so to speak. What this means, is that this site does not use the IPCBB idea, and any BOSS can ban anyone at any time for any (or no) reason. That's a stupid rule! For sheep's sake, don't you realise that this could turn this place into what I like to call "A huge pile of poo". Example: There is a room full of people. A quarter have high powered assualt rifles. The res are unarmed and unarmoured. Any of the gun-holding people can shoot anyone else, and there is nothing preventing them from doing so when they please! What you have, is a police state. THIS IS RIDICOLUS! --ZE SHEEP! (Talk page OF DOOM) 20:48, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- A police state? Don't give me any ideas... (joking, joking!) ...also what is "IPCBB". Also, you haven't really provided any argument. Who holds the guns? The Masses are given power to force the BOSS to do something. It's power to the people! Isn't that something that you always demand? I remember when you and that infidel demanded more democracy, more voting, more power invested in the people. If you don't want these powers given to the Masses, wouldn't you be a hypocrite? "POWER TO THE PEOPLE... NO, NOT THAT POWER!". --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 21:36, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Quisnam vigilo custodis? The answer, here at least, is me. --ZE SHEEP! (Talk page OF DOOM) 20:54, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- His Latin junk translates roughly into "I watch the watchmen". He wants to have power over us, to keep us in check. As he said, "who polices the police?", "who administers the administrators?". He just admitted it... it's him. Also, he doesn't tell us what IPCBB means. It's a part of his agenda, no doubt! --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 18:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- His Latin junk translates roughly into "I watch the watchmen". He wants to have power over us, to keep us in check. As he said, "who polices the police?", "who administers the administrators?". He just admitted it... it's him. Also, he doesn't tell us what IPCBB means. It's a part of his agenda, no doubt! --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 18:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Quisnam vigilo custodis? The answer, here at least, is me. --ZE SHEEP! (Talk page OF DOOM) 20:54, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- A police state? Don't give me any ideas... (joking, joking!) ...also what is "IPCBB". Also, you haven't really provided any argument. Who holds the guns? The Masses are given power to force the BOSS to do something. It's power to the people! Isn't that something that you always demand? I remember when you and that infidel demanded more democracy, more voting, more power invested in the people. If you don't want these powers given to the Masses, wouldn't you be a hypocrite? "POWER TO THE PEOPLE... NO, NOT THAT POWER!". --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 21:36, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I like power to the people, but alowing someone who is not guilty to be banned, is stupid! Use the I.P.C.B.B.! -Sheepman
- Want to know what, Sheepy? The PEOPLE, THE MASSES, want to kick Ben Hun's rear out. Mech Rider, Akbaboy, Me, practically everyone on the dabatase. The only people who think Ben Hun shouldn't be banned are Corai and You. THE MASSES ARE AGAINST YOU. If you want Ben Hun to be saved, it'd be easier for you to revoke your "the masses, democracy, blah blah" argument. --Austin8310-FALCON-DOUBLE FAULT! 13:50, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- 4 people shouldn't be able to decide whether a blog should be deleted or not. Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! [[Special:Contributions/Mectrixctic|see my Special:Editcount/Mectrixctic edits!]] 15:54, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- You msiread that clause. Four people can call for a shutdown of the commentary section. --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 18:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- You msiread that clause. Four people can call for a shutdown of the commentary section. --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 18:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- If the masses want something illegal, then their wish should not be granted. Ego vigilo custodis. --ZE SHEEP! (Quisnam vigilo custodis? Me.) 17:12, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Pure democracy IS mob rule, Sheepman. The will of the people is what they get. No one can watch over PURE democracy, in which everyone is equal and has one vote. To advocate pure democracy is to give the majority what they want and give the minority the shaft. To heck with the 49% who said no, it's the 51% who get their wish. You are so hypocritical. "POWER TO THE PEOPLE", and then the People want something that you don't agree with... "NO, NOT THAT POWER! THE POWER I WANT YOU TO HAVE!". To advocate demoracy AND someone to watch over the watchmen is hypocracy and contradictory. Face it, Sheepman, you secretly want to be a supreme and benovelent dictator with plenary veto and authority over the site, exactly like your opposite. You want your will and influence felt, and sometimes forced, because you, like me, want to make the world a better place. You, like me, feel that you alone are the only one who can instill such morals into a website, so you want to rule. Sheepman, you are so much like me, and you'll never admit it. You like power, you want it, and you just won't comeout and say it, like I have. --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 18:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Sheep, you're not making any sense at all. The entire purpose of democracy is not to satisfy ultimate moral laws that apply to everyone -- it's to do what the largest amount of people wants done. That means the majority can't possibly do anything "illegal", because whatever the majority goes for is legal. So you can't not grant the people's wish because it's illegal, because it never IS illegal. Quod erat demonstrandum. Yours Truly, Explorer 767
(DDD FTW!) View this template 10:46, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Sheep, you're not making any sense at all. The entire purpose of democracy is not to satisfy ultimate moral laws that apply to everyone -- it's to do what the largest amount of people wants done. That means the majority can't possibly do anything "illegal", because whatever the majority goes for is legal. So you can't not grant the people's wish because it's illegal, because it never IS illegal. Quod erat demonstrandum. Yours Truly, Explorer 767
- Pure democracy IS mob rule, Sheepman. The will of the people is what they get. No one can watch over PURE democracy, in which everyone is equal and has one vote. To advocate pure democracy is to give the majority what they want and give the minority the shaft. To heck with the 49% who said no, it's the 51% who get their wish. You are so hypocritical. "POWER TO THE PEOPLE", and then the People want something that you don't agree with... "NO, NOT THAT POWER! THE POWER I WANT YOU TO HAVE!". To advocate demoracy AND someone to watch over the watchmen is hypocracy and contradictory. Face it, Sheepman, you secretly want to be a supreme and benovelent dictator with plenary veto and authority over the site, exactly like your opposite. You want your will and influence felt, and sometimes forced, because you, like me, want to make the world a better place. You, like me, feel that you alone are the only one who can instill such morals into a website, so you want to rule. Sheepman, you are so much like me, and you'll never admit it. You like power, you want it, and you just won't comeout and say it, like I have. --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. † 18:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- So, you're saying nobody gets what you want? To heck with democracy then. Democracy says Ben Hun should go, and Admins say Ben Hun should go. So you don't like democracy or monarchy? I guess we should be communists. --Austin8310-FALCON-DOUBLE FAULT! 17:16, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Roughly, Sheepman's Latin- pardon my language -crap translates into "I watch the watchmen" or "I stand over the gaurds". He thinks that, because his sense of right and wrong is dramitcally different, sometimes the opposite, from mine and ours, he should watch over us and correct our "misjudgements" and errors. I asked him if he was against power, why would he want to become the one supervises and corrects the powerful? He said that "he didn't want any power" and set about contradicting himself. Plus, banning someone isn't illegal. The Master Staff gave the BOSSMASTERS those powers to keep the site in check. The Staff are extremely intelligent and would never give an unlwawful item. Furthermore, he wants to have power over us, to keep us in check. As he said, "who polices the police?", "who administers the administrators?". Why, Sheepman, of course! Only his way is correct! At least I try and hear out other people's suggestions and commentary before silencing them!! Plus, you all know that I've been making an effort to be more tolerant and flexible! I'm coming a long way. --† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) Hey George... ...you forgot Halliburton. †
- @ TS What I mean is, I am the one who always tries to stop the BOSSes doing bad stuff. I DON'T WANT POWER! I am happy with my current position. I never thought one passing remark would cause this... I retract my statement, to avoid further arguments.
@Austin YES! Communism is a basic good idea!
--ZE SHEEP! (Quisnam vigilo custodis? Me.) 19:09, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
Might as well give a few words here. One something I need to tell Turtleshroom. Forgivness does not automatically mean unbanning. Say that Osama Bin Laden was finally caught and put in pirson. Say he was sorry and was crying to the othr people to let him out. If he's actually sorry then he is, but he still did so many bad things to the United States and many other countries that an appology is worthless now. Hopefully instead of Obama making one of his stupid World-Peace moves he'll have that guy executed. Ben Hun is like that also. Whether he's sorry or not he can't keep being let on. You can forgive him, but he should never be allowed on this site again. Thankfully you know this now TS.
Also Sheep just give it up. Ben Hun is a spammer and good luck finding a way to disprove that. With that I end my rant. --Speeddasher
Luck is it? Then it seems fortune has smiled upon me! I have proved this, multiple times, but it seems this is one of those arguments where I make good, valid points and everyone else says "Ah, but I win 'cos you're stupid. So there". --ZE SHEEP! (That sheep is staring at me) 16:35, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
Sheep, we don't know that for sure, so you automatically forfeit your argument by not laying down one in the first place. Yours Truly, Explorer 767 (DDD FTW!) View this template 17:27, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
I have proved this, multiple times
How? If anyone has seen Ben Hun's numerous spam blogs it's easy to tell he's a spammer. It's a known fact. --Speeddasher
VOTE: TS Punishment
Stand up and curtail the madness!
VOTE: TS 6/27/2010 Pardon Barring
Should TurtleShroom's right to unblock a user be totally suspended until his seventeenth birthday?
FOR: TS 6/27/2010 Pardon Barring
- YES! Someone will probably reduce the length anyways. That block was for BH's own good and he (we?) probably wouldn't be in this mess if he served his time. Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! [[Special:Contributions/Mectrixctic|see my Special:Editcount/Mectrixctic edits!]] 01:40, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- YES! Hate ta tell ya this TS, but you're not harsh enough. I like that you give mercy, but too much is a bad thing. --Austin8310-I HAZ A FLAMETHROWER! 02:28, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I too am a christian TS, but you, sorry to say this, AREN'T HARSH ENOUGH! --Anniemoose98, Talk to a BOSS here
11:51, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, TS.--Sir Kwiksilver of TARDIS-No second chances. I'm that sort of a man. 06:13, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. --Speeddasher
AGAINST: TS 6/27/2010 Pardon Barring
- You may need' unblock or pardon someone.----I am Corai.'Hes my best friend best of all best friends Do you have a best friend too? 02:36, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Because TurtleShroom is the only admin capable of unblocking someone. Seroiously, if someone deserves to be unblocked, someone will unblock them. TS isn't the only one.
VOTE: TS Injunction of Pardon
If three users so demand it at any time, should TurtleShroom be forbidden to ever pardon, unblock, or change the sentance of a given villain?
FOR: TS Injunction of Pardon
- Okay. Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! [[Special:Contributions/Mectrixctic|see my Special:Editcount/Mectrixctic edits!]] 17:40, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
AGAINST: TS Injunction of Pardon
*Should be able to change to block length. Citcxirtcem BAAAAAWW to me! [[Special:Contributions/Mectrixctic|see my Special:Editcount/Mectrixctic edits!]] 01:40, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Yah. --Austin8310-I HAZ A FLAMETHROWER! 02:28, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
Mhmm... --Anniemoose98, Talk to a BOSS here11:52, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
Commentary
- Okay, edited to allow for commutation. Vote again!