User blog comment:NotAnEditor/Discussion Club/@comment-UberMerge/@comment-1464097-20091021172353

Sheesh. I left for one day. Right. Both sides state your arguments in a numbered list. Like this:


 * 1) The infrastructure is not destroyed because we build a new one.
 * 2) People will not find the wrong article. If they do, they will find a template at the top saying 'There are other articles by this name. Were you looking for one of them.]]
 * 3) 'Merging' means 'merging'. What else could it mean? We would use the 'www.clubpenguin.wikia.com' URL, but we would likely merge the other wikis here since there are so many more articles here to move. We would then ask Wikia to move our URL.
 * 4) They could not change the COC because it would be protected. However, this does bring up an interesting point: what would the merged wiki's COC be? I think we would first make it our (the Fanon's) COC, as this is the strictest. If I am wrong in thinking this, we would use whichever one is. We would then use the new government (whatever it was) to create a new COC.
 * 5) Of course, not all wikis could join since not all wikis are cencored to our standards. UN-CP, for example, could not join. We would likely also set barriers for entry, such as a minimum number of articles/Users/etc.