User blog:NotAnEditor/Discussion Club

I'm starting a litle project, for discussing (with all the Logic of Explorer) various ... ideas. Obviously, this will have no direct influance over the decision-making processes of the BOB, but if it survives here it will likely survive anything else, exept perhaps a direct collision with TS (JK.)

Now, I'm sure this will be viewed by some as trying to start arguments. However, anyone who has ever been present while Explorer holds a 'logical discussion' will know that arguing simply doesn't come into it. Simple, logical arguments are not 'flame wars' by anyone's standards. I think the confusion tends to arise from the two meanings of 'argument'. As Wikipedia (source of all knowledge) tells us, an argument is:


 * 1) In logic, an argument is a set of one or more meaningful declarative sentences (or "propositions") known as the premises along with another meaningful declarative sentence (or "proposition") known as the conclusion.
 * 2) In general parlance, an argument is a discussion involving conflicting points of view.

Obviously, I mean the first kind.

Now, this will need rules. They can be found here.

So, any comments?