Template talk:Reason

I have a much better idea. You know how Wikipedia has that template stating a list of things that an article needs to have fixed and such? Why not copy that template instead, to make it more formal. This template ends up on the talk page, where no one can see it; it also may not state a user's point clearly (not all human beings can explicitly and clearly state their points or ideas), since the user is the guy who types the list of things that are wrong with the article. With the new template, all you have to do is type "first person" and the template will automatically state, "Improper use of first person pronouns (I, me, my, mine, we, us, our, ours) -- All articles except stories need to be written in either the second person (you, your, yours) or third person (he, him, his, she, her, hers, they, them, their, theirs)."


 * Pros:


 * 1) It saves you a whole lot of typing!
 * 2) It can be seen easily, as it will be located on the actual article.
 * 3) It removes the needs for Template:Mistake and Template:Mistakes, since those templates can be included as a keyword.
 * 4) We will be imitating Wikipedia, as Alex wishes.
 * 5) It will look more formal.
 * 6) It will end this debate.


 * Cons:


 * 1) I can't think of any. Can you?

 Yours "Falsely",   Explorer 767 ( This is your Co-Webmaster speaking!  )    View this template   21:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)