User blog comment:Ben Hun/Vacation..../@comment-93.107.9.118-20100426191058

OK, since I can only comment, I'm using this to talk about TS' Omnibus. I am not using this to talk about the recent 'Ben Hun crisis', as I am relitively ignorant of Ben Hun and Crises (I have, Ironically, been blamed for at least four, but have never actually witnessed one.) I am here to talk of the Omnibus only.

Frankly, I have two things to say of it: it is highly insulting to various individuals, including it's author, Ben Hun and me. I have here created a neutral version, to aid voters. I have also clarified where I felt it to be necissary, and altered any grammer I elt was incorrect. Anyone dissaproving of any change may request a BOSS alter it, as only they may edit comments:

{{Cquote|= The bill = A BILL WRITTEN LIKE A BOSSTHE COC AMENDUM: A SERIES OF AMENDMENTS CONCERNING THE RIGHTS PERTAINING TO EDITORS, BOSSMASTERS, AND TURTLESHROOMCONVENED APRIL 25TH 2010

OVERVIEW
IT IS DEEMED NECESSARY to introduce a large series of legislation, like a BOSS, to prevent future crises, like that experienced in the days prior to this Bill.

FORMALITIES

 * THE CHAOS that occurred in these days prior to the submittal of this Bill like a BOSS are to officially be recognized as the third Crisis to occur on the Club Penguin Fanon Wiki.


 * BEN HUN is to be considered the primary factor in the unfolding of this Crisis. TurtleShroom is to be additionally cited as a major contributing factor.


 * BEN HUN is to be punished as deemed just by the overall consensus of all voters, both BOSS and otherwise, and, excluding verbal contracts made in the days prior, is to never receive his Seized articles' OOC rights back, excluding Lulz-Cat, which shall remain in his possession indefinitely.

THE BOSS

 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the BOSS to shut blog commentary off for any reason they so deem necessary, OR if four Users so request.


 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow the BOSS to issue blocks in exess of those currently legal.


 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow for the seizure of intellectual property (and release thereof into Fair Game or give it to those who wish to edit and use it onward) or other material deemed appropriate IF four Users so request.

POWER GIVEN TO VOTERS

 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow any User to call for sudden and immediant halting of commentary in any blog as they see fit. If four or more users so demand and vote for a commentary shutdown and provide a good reason, a shutdown is to be administed by a BOSSMASTER.


 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow any User to call for seizure of intellectual property from any user for any reason they deem fit, and to proceed to give it to whomever wants it (or release it), if four or more users so demand.


 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow any User to call for the Deletion of any blog, should they deem necessary. If four or more users so consent, the blog is to be deleted by a BOSSMASTER.


 * THE BILL HEREBY AMENDS THE COC to allow any User to call for an injunction of any User to stop doing something they deem inappropriate. If four users so consent, the BOSS are to administer the Injunction on their behalf through a talk page message. Failure to obey an injunction will result in a week's block per violation. After seven times, the block is changed to be infinite. Injunctions are to function in similar fashion to real-world restraining orders.

DEFINITIONS

 * HENCEFORTH, " COMMENTING REPEATEDLY IN BIG, BOLD TEXT " is to be deemed Vandalism, not spam, and is to be treated and punished as such.


 * HENCEFORTH, a "pardon" is to be defined as a total revocation of a standing block, allowing the formerly blocked User to run free. Reduction of sentence is to not be considered as such, rather, as simply a commutation, unless the sentance is reduced to a time under 24 hours.


 * HENCEFORTH, all blog commentary posted by a user while under the influence of alcohol is to be deleted on the spot, if said poisoning is admitted by said User.

POWER REMOVED FROM TURTLESHROOM
==== (Subject o a seperate vote)


 * AS A LEADING CAUSE IN THE CRISIS, the User addressed in TurtleShroom is to Surrender his ability to pardon users until June 27th, 2010 (GMT). His blocking authority and rights are to continue as is. The authority to pardon will be restored after the aforementioned date.


 * THIS BILL HEREBY ALLOWS ANY USER to call for an Injunction on TurtleShroom, at any time after June 27th 2010, from ever pardoning a user or commutating his sentence. If three or more users so demand, TurtleShroom can not pardon or reduce the sentence of a blocked User. A convientent template may be installed to remind him of such. He may, however, increase the sentence, but if increased, TurtleShroom may not decrease it.


 * THESE AMENDMENTS DO NOT EFFECT any other BOSSMASTER or their powers.}}

The above is of course unnoficial, and serves only as a guide.

Secondly, although the Bill does contain several good ideas, it also contains bad ones, and loopholes tat are truly massive. I feel bound at this point to mention the loopholes, although several could be of immense use to me. I do not feel bound, however, to point them out in detail, as it will be very easy to abuse them if this bill passes. I feel that, as someone who is very good at exploiting loopholes, I should not widen them any more.

Anyway, it is full of loopholes, and these will likely be exploited. Indeed, if it is passed, I may use them myself. Not to the full, as that could severely damage the Wiki, but just enough to encourage Rights, Freedom, and Regulated Censorship] (Censorship that cannot overstep it's bounds. My own system, so it may not work. I have been busy these long, banned months.

In short, although it has many good points, to vote for it is to vote for both good and bad. And the bad is so bad it could even ressurect the dreaded 'AgentGenius'[sic]! Beware! Beware!

Yours,

NAE

19:10, April 26, 2010 (UTC)