User blog comment:Mectrixctic/Re-writing Puffle article somewhat/@comment-1024726-20091017140011

Mex, you still don't get it. The fact that fur color is almost always a shade of orange, red, yellow, white, or black is not a DEFINING characteristic, just a characteristic.

According to my logic book, confusing the accidental (properties that are not necessary to the subject) and the essential (properties necessary to the subject) is a fallacy. "Polluted" could be an accident of LIQUID water, but "fluid" is necessary.

Fur is NOT necessarily a shade of red, yellow, orange, white, or black, it doesn't have to be. Fur is hair, and neither of them are defined by pigment. Definition of fur: the dressed hairy coat of a mammal, NOT the dressed red, orange, yellow, white, brown, or black coat of a mammal.