User blog comment:NotAnEditor/User blog:NotAnEditor/@comment-Discussion Club/@comment-Requests For Adminship OR Stability Doctrine?/@comment-1024726-20091118185739

Remember, this is supposed to be CIVIL. This isn't a vote, this is a logical discussion.

Ahem. You misunderstand, I've complained about SHEEPMAN'S lack of logic in giving his reasons for promoting you. And as such, you really don't have much reason to sneak in that striked-out sentence.

The Stability Doctrine BY DEFAULT overrules the RfA. Why? Well, then, how else could the clause "NAE is not to be promoted in any way" have any power at all if it weren't superior to the RfA? A vote on the RfA cannot change the Stability Doctrine. It is only fair that a separate vote concerning the Stability Doctrine itself be proposed before NAE can be subject to an RfA vote.