User blog comment:NotAnEditor/Discussion Club/@comment-1024726-20091011012115

I like the idea, just as long as it does not have any real judging power and is there only for examining our wiki's content and seeing how to improve it.

However, I disagree with the judge thing on the rules page. No man should be given the authority to call a fallacy or declare the "winner"; man is too biased to be given that power. Only logical rules themselves can declare invalid arguments and who wins a debate. I believe that if you see a fallacy, name it and post a link to an article about it on a TRUSTWORTHY SITE (like Wikipedia). Also, if any arguments are ambiguous, don't just twist them to make them fallacious, your opponent might not have meant that. You should ask your opponent to clarify.

Other than that, I'm in. =)