Forum:Webmaster Rights?

I am quite befuddled. I just gave this some thought, and I realised something. The webmasters really have no powers! Here are the rights of the users:


 * IP Adresses: Seems that they have no rights on this wiki.


 * Users: Can Vote, Can Request for Admin, Edit, Create and Move Articles


 * Rollbacks: Can rollback spam and vandalism quickly and easily.


 * Sysops: Rollback, Protect, and delete articles, can block users..


 * Beuracrats: Demote those with admin levels, Can promote users to higher Admin levels.


 * Webmaster: Basicly, the rights beurecrats have, 'cept since this is a Fanon Wiki, they use their imaginations for power.

I honestly do not like being webmaster, I pretty much despise the title. But, since this is a "democracy", I had to take it. I reseign from my position, as I never wanted a fancy title and the same powers I already had.

So, why do we have the term anyways?

I know, everyone will say "It'd be chaos and anarchy without it". But before Robbsi, of the Club Penguin Wiki, the webmaster term didn't exist. If anyone has editing the CPW before Robbsi, was it chaos? No. The trouble started with the term, figure that.

I have no desire to stir up a crisis like the old laws of the CPW. I just don't see why everyone thinks an imaginary power, which causes trouble and crisis, is so good? It doesnt really solve any problems, either.

So, why exactly is the term here? Why is it in use? I don't think it should be. A direct democracy would probobly be best, in which the users are equal, and the tasks of adminship mean nothing government-wise. Not as they currently are, to abuse and rule over more of the Wiki.

-- Triskelle3 19:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)